The Return of the Jedi novelization is mostly interesting for the hints we get of the Star Wars prequels… and the aspects that didn’t ultimately come to pass.
Oh, and also for making Ewok warfare seem a bit more threatening.
The Return of the Jedi novelization was written by James Kahn, a guy who wrote a few more film novelizations (Poltergiest, Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, The Goonies), a few of original books (Time’s Dark Laughter, Timefall), and some TV episodes (Star Trek: TNG, Xena, TekWar, All My Children). And it’s a completely serviceable novel overall. Honestly, the parts where the novel are retreading the movie word for word are boring, and don’t add much to the experience. It’s the asides that you have to watch out for….
For example, this book bothers to discuss the position occupied by droids in the universe, the way they are treated as disposable things without sentience. Threepio frequently complains about it, and we see even more of it in EV-9D9’s droid torture chamber; the idea that droids have sensors that enable them to feel pain at all is mortifying. (Also, in this book and Tales From Jabba’s Palace, EV-9D9 is described as having “female” programming, which I find fascinating for a multitude of reasons.) Oddly, Kahn frequently mentions Threepio “smiling” at one comment or another… which, of course, he cannot do.
Lando’s character is expanded upon in this book, and I can’t decide if I like it better or worse than what we can infer on screen. The novel goes to great lengths to give us Lando’s internal monologue about practically everything that he does in the story–and Lando makes a point of thinking of everything in gambling terms. Literally everything. In some ways it’s charming, but it gets a little wearing after a while. Though it does provide some good reasoning behind some of the choices he makes during the battle sequences.
Leia’s subjugation by Jabba is given more detail that I’d just as soon never read. (And in the book, Jabba kills Oola simply because she won’t get close enough to him.) He kisses her, right at the start of the whole thing. There’s intimation of far worse, but Leia decides that she can deal with it because nothing could possibly be as bad as the time she was tortured by Vader. It’s all discomfiting. On the other hand, the novel makes it clear much sooner that Leia is constantly connected to the Force–only, she doesn’t understand that that’s what it is. (It’s even suggested that she calls on it to strangle Jabba to death, which is cool in theory, but I’m also really fine with figuring that Leia does her push ups.) The narrative also hints even more successfully at her familial relationship to Luke, making it clear how well the two can sense each other, even if they can’t quite understand the bond.
The moral ambiguity of what Luke is doing to Jabba and his entourage is made more prevalent, as well as Luke’s uncertainty in how he’s meant to use his newfound power. In that way, Luke’s journey feels more cohesive, more transparent. He is being cocky on the sailbarge, and he is happy to destroy these people who caused pain to friends and neighbors.
Han’s arc is made much clearer with the restoration and expansion of a deleted scene from the film–one where Han takes more time to thank Luke for the rescue. We begin to understand that this is the point at which Han begins to feel that he belongs with the Rebels. That it took all these people showing up for him to make him realize that this was where he preferred to be. It leads to this adorable aside where Han getting all emotional puts everyone at a loss:
Luke saw a difference had come over his friend, like a sea change. It was a gentle moment; he didn’t want to disturb it. So he only nodded.
Chewie growled affectionately at the young Jedi warrior, mussing his hair like a proud uncle. And Leia warmly hugged him.
They all had great love for Solo, but somehow it was easier to show it by being demonstrative to Luke.
D’awwww.
Luke’s affection for both Yoda and Obi-Wan is expanded upon, as well as his acknowledgement of their roles in his life as agents of loss. He loves his teachers while being fully aware that their tutelage is responsible for the painful truths he’s had to overcome, and the innocence he’s lost. His discussion with Obi-Wan shows that the general plan for the prequels had always been in place:
Luke sensed the underlying meaning in Kenobi’s statement, he heard the words as a command. He shook his head back at the vision. “I can’t kill my own father.”
“You should not think of that machine as your father.” It was the teacher speaking again. “When I saw what has become of him, I tried to dissuade him, to draw him back from the dark side. We fought … your father fell into a molten pit. When your father clawed his way out of that fiery pool, the change had been burned into him forever–he was Darth Vader., without a trace of Anakin Skywalker. Irredeemably dark. Scarred. Kept alive only by machinery and his own black will …”
Obi-Wan also shoulders a clearer guilt where Anakin is concerned, insisting that Vader’s fall was his own fault. We get a window in on Vader’s plans, his discontent at the Emperor’s side and desire to train Luke and have him for his own apprentice. It’s chilling mostly due to the fact that it’s clear Vader harbors affection for his child, even if he can’t quite understand the emotion for what it is.
Mon Mothma’s background as a founding member of the Alliance is given all the time here that Episode III failed to give her, explaining the position she was meant to embody as a Senator who saw the corruption in the Republic and decided to act rather than stand still. We get a far more involved story when Threepio tells the Ewoks of their fight against the Empire, and eventually Han, Luke and Leia add their voices to his narrative. (Particularly Han–he gets awfully wordy and emotional here.) Then Wicket speaks to the Ewok council, insisting that they have a responsibility to fight. While I understand the purpose of these exchanges, they are super clunky, and it’s just as well that they never made it into the film. On the other hand, Ewok warfare seems a far better match against the Imperials forces in this book; it’s not because they have better weapons, but because they are described in much higher numbers. Essentially, every time a few of them die (and many of them do), a dozen more rise up in their place. It’s a pretty great image, one that would have been fun to see on screen.
The book makes it obvious that Leia knew her mother for far longer than Episode III eventually allows, so that’s something that was clearly changed when the prequels were made. In addition, Obi-Wan mentions Owen Lars as his brother, which was a sacked piece of canon.
We get a better idea of the push and pull Luke is feeling as the Emperor tries to wear down his defenses. His shock to know the Death Star is functional, his fear at finding the dark side so quickly when cornered. Luke’s thought process during his showdown with Vader is an interesting take, where we learn that Vader only finds out about Leia because Luke can sense her pain in the battle down below, and Vader probes his mind for the information. That violation makes more sense out of his sudden outburst, and his conclusion at the end of the fight leads him to understand that he doesn’t hate either Vader or the Emperor–only the darkness within them. His renouncement of the dark side is an acknowledgement that he can only vanquish it by disengaging from it.
And another interesting take: in the novel, it is suggested that Vader isn’t deciding whether or not he wants to save Luke from the Emperor’s Force lightning in those last moment. Rather, the narrative tells us that Vader is so weak now that he is pooling every last bit of his reserves to commit this final act. He tries to follow the Emperor into the abyss, but Luke pulls him back. On the other hand, there’s a weird thing where Vader is dying in the docking bay, and he’s awfully concerned about how ugly he imagines he looks. I get it, he’s a shadow of his former self, but he just managed to kill the Emperor and save his kid; it seems a weird thing to get stuck on, even in your head. It sort of detracts from that final goodbye.
The book wraps up right quick when all the action is over, and it just sort of stops. And you’re left with a kind of meh feeling. So I’d say probably give this one a pass unless you’re a completist. It’s got some fun bits, but it’s nothing to get excited over.
Emmet Asher-Perrin really wants unread those bits with Jabba and Leia though. You can bug her on Twitter and Tumblr, and read more of her work here and elsewhere.
When I was younger I never really thought about how Luke at Jabba’s Palace was, if not dark side, at least non-light side and satisfying for him when it came to killing the monsters of his homeworld/childhood. It has an interesting parallel with the moment when Anakin slaughters all of the Separatist leaders he’d been fighting for years and probably feels cathartic justice doing it. Except he was already dark side at this point.
If that scene had happened before Anakin killed his fellow Jedi at the temple, it would have been even more interesting as a parallel, because it would have shown how Luke could have kept going down the same path Vader did at that pivotal point, but didn’t. So when Vader taunted Luke about protecting his friends, and Luke didn’t give in, Vader would see Luke’s inherent goodness where he himself failed with Padme.
Great review, as ever. I don’t think Luke being happy about destroying even his enemies fits with what I understand the Jedi way to be… on the other hand, I’ve always argued (well, since the prequels went and loused up my image of the Jedi, anyway) that Luke was forging a new way of being Jedi, one that doesn’t avoid attachments and emotion. Learning to cope with emotions is part of being a healthy human, so I guess Luke can take some satisfaction in being the instrument of justice (although are we really supposed to believe every critter aboard Jabba’s sail barge was there by choice, when we know for a fact that Leia wasn’t? Seems to be taking guilt-by-association to an absurd extreme… and just dismissing them all as “monsters” — well, thank the Maker folks don’t do that in the real world, I guess….)
While I imagine that this book would make me cringe if I reread it now, I read it a lot in my early high school years because that was the only way to “see” the movie repeatedly when we didn’t have a VCR and the nearest movie theater was fifteen miles away and I couldn’t drive. I have to give it at least partial credit for my high verbal score on the SAT because I recall there being a lot of words in it that I figured out from context but didn’t know for sure. On one reading pass I made a point of looking them up in the dictionary and then writing out the words and the definitions — and most of those words ended up on the SAT. I remember in particular that this was where I learned the word “ephemeral.”
I did pull it off the shelf after seeing Episode III of the prequels because the continuity issues about Leia remembering her mother and Obi Wan talking about Owen as his brother irked me. I had to rewatch the movie to recall that Owen as brother wasn’t actually in the movie, since the book was more familiar than the movie.
It seems like you’re covering the original version of the novel.
I think I read somewhere that the current printing includes some revisions to make it fit a little more with the prequels.
Oh, it’s hinted that Leia uses the Force to strangle Jabba? Nice, I wonder if that’s from any script hint…
I love these reviews. Are you going to review the new movie and book too!? And if so, when?
I also read this repeatedly back when it first came out, like @Shanna in #3 above, mostly because, pre-VCR, that was the only way to experience the story again. But even then I’m pretty sure I realized it was kind of unsatisfactory in a lot of ways.
I really, really wish they had kept the idea that Lars was Obi-Wan’s brother. It makes so much more sense than for him to be at all related to Anakin. The prequels make Obi-Wan out to be an idiot: let’s go hide Luke on Anakin’s homeworld with Anakin’s step-brother and not bother to change his name. Don’t worry, I’ll watch over him as “Ben” Kenobi, nobody will ever be able to figure out that I’m actually Obi-Wan Kenobi! I won’t bother to actually train Luke though.
In my head, Anakin and Obi-Wan have an adventure during the Clone Wars (or leading up to them) that takes them to Tatooine, so Lars gets a chance to meet Anakin. Years later, Obi-Wan decides to hide Luke with his brother, figuring that Anakin wouldn’t really remember much about Lars or Tatooine.
That has bugged me ever since the prequels. But how dumb does that make Vader look, that he had a kid with his last name, living with his stepbrother on his home planet, at a home he’d visited, with someone named Kenobi nearby, and he didn’t figure out that he had a kid until Luke became famous for blowing up the Death Star? Still, it would have been a lot smarter of Obi-Wan to keep Luke himself, make up aliases for them that were their universe’s equivalent of “John Smith and his son Jimmy Smith,” and stay somewhat on the move with a low profile as he trains Luke.
After ROTJ, it amused me to think that all the things Owen said about his brother in the original movie were actually about Obi-Wan rather than Anakin. But instead, Owen barely knew his stepbrother.
I’ve always figured that hiding Luke on Tatooine wasn’t a bad idea. It seems to me as if it’s probably the one place in the galaxy that Vader will never go to. Why would he want to return to the place that reminds him of a) being a slave, b) Padme and c) his mother’s death?